What happens when a citizen files a complaint against a judge, the institution responsible for examining that complaint is chaired by a relative of the judge, and the challenged magistrates take part in the decision rejecting their own recusal?
A young man sentenced to nine years for sexual offences was acquitted after spending 785 days in custody. This investigative podcast reconstructs the case, examines the stark contradiction between the Court of Corts and the High Court, and scrutinizes pretrial detention, witness testimony, autism, the expert assessments of…
A devastating 42-minute investigative podcast exposing the collapse of the BPA case as a judicial and institutional disaster. Through the analysis of defence arguments, procedural abuses, police errors, retroactive legal reasoning, political pressure, and the wider comparison with Spain, the episode argues that BPA was not…
This podcast explores the growing issues of privacy, digital rights, and technological power in Andorra. It critically analyzes how European legislative proposals, presented under the banner of administrative simplification, could weaken personal data protection.