A documented investigation into the judicial ordeal of André and Madeleine Dubuc: disputed signatures, inflated debt, pension seizures, a non-existent over-indebtedness procedure, a phantom guardianship and untraceable funds. At the centre stands Vincent Anière, a French magistrate who also held a senior judicial post in Andorra.
What happens when a citizen files a complaint against a judge, the institution responsible for examining that complaint is chaired by a relative of the judge, and the challenged magistrates take part in the decision rejecting their own recusal?
A young man sentenced to nine years for sexual offences was acquitted after spending 785 days in custody. This investigative podcast reconstructs the case, examines the stark contradiction between the Court of Corts and the High Court, and scrutinizes pretrial detention, witness testimony, autism, the expert assessments of…
A critical investigation into the stark contrast between the harsh treatment of minor drug cases and the leniency shown in a €3.6 million money-laundering case.
A devastating 42-minute investigative podcast exposing the collapse of the BPA case as a judicial and institutional disaster. Through the analysis of defence arguments, procedural abuses, police errors, retroactive legal reasoning, political pressure, and the wider comparison with Spain, the episode argues that BPA was not…
A pardon request exposes a devastating accusation against Andorra’s justice system: a civil dispute over fiduciary fees was allegedly turned into a criminal case, involving prison for debt, obstruction of the right to defence, a blocked appeal, police pressure, and a professional ban later annulled by the Constitutional Court.
A pardon request exposes a devastating accusation against Andorra’s justice system: a civil dispute over fiduciary fees was allegedly turned into a criminal case, involving prison for debt, obstruction of the right to defence, a blocked appeal, police pressure, and a professional ban later annulled by the Constitutional Court.
The Andorran Data Protection Agency (APDA) has archived the complaints about artificial intelligence, video surveillance and body cameras with an unacceptable logic: it demands that citizens prove the damage has already happened, when its legal and institutional duty is to prevent that damage from occurring.
This podcast explores the growing issues of privacy, digital rights, and technological power in Andorra. It critically analyzes how European legislative proposals, presented under the banner of administrative simplification, could weaken personal data protection.
In this debate episode, we examine the Resma Punjabi case and the crisis that shook Andorra’s Data Protection Agency, the APDA. Drawing on documented facts, legal reforms, political tensions, and media coverage, two voices confront different interpretations of the same sequence of events.
In this episode, we examine the so-called Punjabi case and the institutional crisis surrounding Andorra’s Data Protection Agency, the APDA. Through legal reforms, political tensions, media coverage, and a detailed timeline of key events, we explore how an institution created to protect fundamental rights could end up weakened,…